CTSamurai Forums

I tried to protect Ian, as he seems to be one of the few capable of getting to the bottom of this rather confusing game. Not sure what you mean by your post Titi, you don't seem to be saying much of anything. I protected you on night 1 seeing as you implied that you had a rather powerful night abili...

Sorry nonplus, off the mark mate. I am a doctor, who doesn't seem to be doing too well. Imagine that. I protected Ian last night, but was either blocked or he was killed twice. The SK/Vigilante is still out there. It wouldn't surprise me if Mr B was vig/sk, historically he has not always been on the...

I'm sure Kirks role should have been something to do with Green Ladies, (Becks or Rube play any Orcs?)

Last nights actions are not very illuminating to be honest. No one seems to have had any dreams, and Titi seems to have had a disappointing evening.

We seem to be shooting in the dark. "Tomb of Immortal Darkness?" I am still up for seeing if Ropey is immortal. I am not convinced by either Ian or Seppy. They both manage to confuse and complicate many discussions so far in these games. And it is difficult to determine what their hidden a...

Kapoentje wrote:Clarification for why Ropey's non-vote adds to my suspicion of him. We're 3.5h away from the deadline, friday night. Given the usual low weekendactivity, there's no reason at all to try & rush the next day at this point.

The next day will happen tonight no matter what. 8pm I think.

I felt that Ian had a fairly valid point of view, but now you say it like that.

I don't know who to believe or vote for.

unvote.

Kryten wrote: I read commando's post but on my phone so to difficult to quote the parts I want. I agree I think someone is lying about the dreams and I also agree on your suspicions but I dont understand why you're not voting for raeneid. Makes more sense to me. Also not 100% sure of you either but ...

Wow, 300 posts and no one dead yet! I think quiet people should be looked at, and perhaps surface. Hopefully to assist. Bearing in mind that the only reason he didn't get "maybe" lynched on day 1 because he had been lynched a couple of times before on day 1. Unfortunately it does not allev...

That does not implicate me. All you have on me is an inconclusive investigation and some quotes taken out of context, on separate issues. Now that we've been through all this I can actually tend to agree as well. You can't blame me for thinking my results for the night were odd and needed pursued. ...

Quote 2. About the strange and possibly untrue actions you supposedly carried out, I am stating exactly that. There are 3 or 4 people who can corroborate that you performed an action on Ian. Judging by the fact that Ian did not die, there must be something else going on. Exactly what I've been sayi...

I'm not buying that Kryten, I got no response to actions last night as I have none. Now: Quote 1. We are all talking about and referring to Ropeys ability to not die. Sorry to disappoint, but this should and was a major talking point at the time. Quote 2. About the strange and possibly untrue action...

Apologies for not being clear. I am referring to a character type which does not give you a result of an investigation as true (Like a Miller, the information is false or inconclusive). Please explain to me where this is lying. You are stringing me up based on an investigation which does not give a ...

Based on what? You think this dream role is listed in the game? Your argument does not make sense. My arguement is you don't know what you're talking about. I clearly stated what my investigation results were. You say some rubbish that shows you don't know what's going on and then ask me a question...

Eh...

that quote did not work as expected!

Kryten wrote:

Devious wrote: Your "unique role" does not cause confusion.

Based on what? You think this dream role is listed in the game? Your argument does not make sense.